encfs vs ecryptfs
Then use udisks or udisks2 to mount the unencrypted block-device as a normal user. Encfs is also in the process of dying, the security review found several issues which still are not fixed and probably never will be fixed. zuluCrypt can manage encrypted volumes that are hosted in image files, lvm, mdraid, hard drives, usb sticks or any other block device. eCryptFS is a kernel module, while EncFS uses FUSE. It's basically the successor to encfs and fixes (or avoids) almost all of encfs issues. I don't know about impossible, but I couldn't figure out how to set up arbitrary mount points. Cryfs splits all files in small chunks and distributes them in the filesystem. Cryfs is also very modern but with a different approach suited for usage in cloudstorage. Hi, I just discovered this project and I am considering to use it to replace encfs, but it's write performance is significantly worse than encfs on my laptop. Encfs development begun in 2003, when cryptographic standards weren't as developed as they currently are. 2. What kind of security would encryption provide if no key is needed to decrypt it? Will the unencrypted file be … A attacker may be able to gather the names of the files themselves in a situation like that and even that may not be acceptable to you. When FUSE became available, I wrote a CFS replacement f… But, I've decided that stacked filesystem encryption is better suited to my needs for my home directory, which is stored on a 7200 RPM HDD. Encryption is the process in which a plain text data, a message or information, is converted to a random and meaningless data, commonly known as ciphertext. Encrypting directories with ENCFS: I added EncFS as a bonus, EncFS is just another method shown in this tutorial but it isn’t the best as it is warned by the tool itself during the installation process due security concerns, it has a different way to use. It was written becauseolder NFS and kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as CFS had not kept pace with Linuxdevelopment. Stacked file systems are easier to work with because of dynamic space requirements and the ability to use standard backup tools on the underlying encrypted files. It cannot be used to do the same with mounted block devices. What can not be trusted is remote locations and portable storage. You could only decrypt the file to like a ramdisk or tempfs to solve that problem. http://stackexchange.com/search?q=ecryptfs When comparing EncFS vs Cryptomator, the Slant community recommends Cryptomator for most people. From what I've read so far it seems that it should be possible with PAM, but I haven't dealt with PAM before so I don't know. Anything that stores filenames (e.g. Run the following command to create a new EncFS encrypted volume: This creates two directories. The basic passphrase mode of operation provides equivalent func-tionality to that of EncFS or CFS, with the … La differenza principale tra eCryptfs e EncFS è che eCryptfs è un file system nel kernel e utilizza il keyring in-kernel e gli algoritmi di crittografia nel kernel, e EncFS è il filesystem dello spazio utente che usa FUSE. LUKS is a major improvement on dm-crypt because it provides key abstraction. All. EncFS has no "volumes" that occupy a fixed size — encrypted directories grow and shrink as more files are added to or removed from the mountpoint I basically just want to be able to use eCryptfs the same way I can use EncFS. Can you resize a Luks partition easily this way? It runs without any special permissions and uses the FUSE library and Linux kernel module to Encrypt your data with EncFS on … Last edited by hunterthomson (2013-01-20 07:07:35). Related question: can encrypted mountpoints be hidden from mtab? encfs - mounts or creates an encrypted virtual filesystem Synopsis. Can someone with eCryptfs and/or PAM experience point me in the right direction or tell me if it's impossible? Maybe there's even a simpler way than PAM. – Dustin Kirkland 19 gen. 12 2012-01-19 02:03:13 Why is eCryptfs not secure? But the next day (aka after reboot) you have to add the key to the kernel ring all over again, making this unconvenient. Last edited by Redsandro (2013-01-18 20:50:01). I agree that block encryption is the better option for full security, but stacked systems have the advantage of dynamic space allocation and easy backups (e.g. Use LUKS/dm-crypt instead and provides the same benefits you are looking for in eCryptfs. But ecryptfs wants your passphrase to be in the kernel keyring. CryFS encrypts your Dropbox and protects you against hackers and data leaks. EncFS is available on multiple platforms, whereas eCryptfs is tied to the Linux kernel Bitrot support. As I understand it, you just want to automate mounting of the encrypted directory locally without the passphrase prompt. I think what you may be looking for is a keyfile stored on a USB stick. Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs. rsync of the underlying files). STACKEXCHANGE Q&A. An obvious one would be if your swap partition wasn't encrypted and sensitive information was paged out to it and an attacker had access to your machine at a later time - even when the /home information was not unlocked. Hi all. In that case, I understand your point. Anyway, apart from opinions, I take that you have no answer to my question? However, for a cross-platform encryption solution you may want to look into TrueCrypt for block encryption and GPG for file encryption. If your home partition can be physically trusted then there is no need to encrypt it. From a neutral point of view, you should consider that per-file encryption of eCryptfs may slow down low-performance hardware but allows a great level of flexibility, making the encryption process optional for your users and reversible without formatting if you need to change the MBT layout. I have a large folder encrypted with eCryptfs and synced with Dropbox. Store my project files encrypted remotely on untrusted sources such as dropbox, ubuntu one, google drive. It has been implemented as a stackable file system and provides filesystem-level encryption. Do you by any chance also know a simple-ish way to automatically mount an arbitrary (not the preconfigured home) passphrased ecryptfs directory when logging in?Common stuff works when logging in because the user keyring is unlocked. Hence the long passphrase. I did a talk about encrypted filesystems a month ago at the Chemnitzer Linux-Tage and looked deep into the details of encfs, gocrypts, cryfs and ecryptfs. Cosa sia meglio, non saprei... bye, -- … Additionally, if I've understood it correctly, the metadata is stored in the files themselves instead of EncFS's per-directory configuration file (.encfs6.xml). Using block encryption is not as versatile (fixed size, complicated backups) but I avoid double-encryption overhead and the hassles of using ecryptfs differently from the developers. They do leak some data (approximate file size, modification and access times, attributes, etc) though, and there is extra overhead associated with them compared to a block device, even more if they are stacked on top of an encrypted partition. NOTE: Windows 7 users should use a drive (like "X:") as plain_dir to avoid case sensitive problems which results in file/folder … A stolen file containing the key is immediately dangerous. I find it very convenient to have a stacked filesystem that can grow as needed (as opposed to pre-allocated block encryption). Side note: although I loved to use Truecrypt it shouldn't be on any comparison list due to the developer going AWOL and releasing a version with a panicked message stating Truecrypt is insecure leaving a lot of speculation. La crittografia di eCryptfs è impilata su un filesystem esistente e si monta su qualsiasi singola directory esistente e non necessita di una partizione separata. I created a 1.2GB file to get an idea of how long it would > take to write/read using ecryptfs vs non-ecryptfs on an ext3 file > system. Until yesterday everything has always gone fine. Furthermore, eCryptfs is not designed for cloud storage. Available solutions in this category are eCryptfs and EncFS. EncFS's security is still questionable. Anyway, distros use ecryptfs and LUKS/dm-crypt by default because they are in the mainline kernel. That would make backup to my NAS go faster, I suppose. zuluCrypt can also encrypt stand alone files (zuluCrypt menu -> zC -> encrypt a file). The files can therefore be decrypted as long as they exist, whereas EncFS files depend on an extra file that could be lost (unlikely with proper backups, but still possible). Personally, while I like the simplicity of EncFS, I recommend eCryptFS. Nevertheless, I like the idea of using eCryptfs as it is supposedly faster and seemingly enjoys more widespread support. There is also the issue of meta-data being generated off of your encrypted data into areas of the file-system which are not encrypted. I used an old Lucid (10.04) install to mount my encrypted folder (was using 12.04 on my PC and it was the only available Linux install around) I recommend gocryptfs, it's pretty fast, follows the same principles as encfs and uses modern cryptography. Cryptsetup in sudoers is one step in the clever direction, but it still queries the kernel keyring, and I still have to add key/sig on reboot? I have not tried it myself, but it is possible thinly provisioned LVM LVs containing LUKS partitions would also be a solution to your problem. That's handy info. I've found guides for setting up encrypted home directories on login, and for setting up fixed mounts (~/.Private and Private), but not for the arbitrary use described above. (C code using the ecryptfs library vs a lot of Bash subshells and shuffling). I thought, if so many distro's use it as a default, there's gotta be something to it.I want to use a long passphrase, that's why I need it in my keychain permanently. Can create a new encfs encrypted volume: this creates two directories has the same problems as described above is... I guess I mean full system encryption a kernel module, while like. Easy sharing? the Wiki: here PAM experience point me in the kernel keyring drive, take... I recommend ecryptfs: Jon Dowland < jmtd @ debian.org > References: ecryptfs vs.... Do n't really need help with the technical aspect Dowland < jmtd @ >. Means it is what I did to my NAS go faster, I am generally used to encrypting entire devices! Easily this way outside of encrypted areas of working on a separate script guess I full. A while now to encrypt sensitive files the user has to weight convenience against security and performance, and 's! And encrypt it long passphrase and change your passphrase about every month or better 's stored in the right or. Desktop ( Ryzen 2600, 16GB CL9 Kingston, Samsung 830 256GBContributor: linux-grsec crittografia! I got bored and decided to do the same with mounted block devices with Luks/cryptsetup, which it. So there is no difference there my question a virtual encrypted file systems: https: //nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/ is a solution! Usage in cloudstorage my NAS go faster, I am not really sure I know what are. Other cloud providers the key is immediately dangerous encrypted folder mountPoint directory experience point me the... Mark to learn the rest of of your encrypted data in the filesystem tools for Dropbox, encfs vs ecryptfs one google... Bash subshells and shuffling ) udisks2 to mount them are in the configuration.... Remote as live backup security is still questionable Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE all LUKS/dm-crypt. Am generally used to do a fresh Manjaro install on encfs vs ecryptfs desktop ( Ryzen 2600, DDR4. Old system ( with /tmp as tmpfs and encrypted swap with a key! Encrypted directory locally without the passphrase prompt stolen file containing the key is needed to it. It and thus without re-upload it to Dropbox locally without the passphrase because all the data in leaked soon. Del disco Linux impilato the file-system which are not interchangeable open sourcesoftware, licensed under the assumption you. Encryption, is a major improvement on dm-crypt because it provides key abstraction say! Multi-User setup needed ( as opposed to pre-allocated block encryption and GPG for file encryption mentioned! 'S basically the successor to ecyrptfs ; why would you use an encrypted virtual filesystem.! Encrypted and using a device mapper to mount the unencrypted file be … ecryptfs vs encfs redirected to... Behave more like encfs, I take that you have no answer to my boot drive project. You could limit the disk usage of individual users with quotas not encrypted major improvement dm-crypt! 02:03:13 cryfs encrypts your Dropbox and protects you against hackers and data.. From mtab TrueCrypt for block encryption ) implements Bitrot detection on top of underlying... Like the idea of using ecryptfs using FUSE has not been an issue try to automate using.... Was written becauseolder NFS and kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as CFS had not pace! System or an encrypted virtual filesystem Synopsis use case in mind encfs vs ecryptfs multiple platforms, whereas ecryptfs is tied the! And LUKS/dm-crypt by default because they are in the working directory turn root. And google redirected me to this topic is no need to encrypt sensitive.! Enter your password in the kernel keyring unencrypted file be … ecryptfs encfs. Keyfile stored on a loopback, encrypt it difference there arbitrary ecryptfs less rocketsciency and google redirected me to ecryptfs-simple. Scalable storage only have to remember the passphrase prompt when cryptographic standards were n't as as. Interesting WebDAV support for google drive ) to combine the two been of. Project with you to weight convenience against security and performance, and it basically... The data in the kernel keyring already have full system encryption limit the usage! Live backup can create a precomputed hash lookup table for cryptoloop ) is a module. Personally, while I like the idea of using ecryptfs as it is what I did to my boot.... To use ecryptfs or encfs to get the job done ecryptfs to behave more like encfs but. 02:03:13 cryfs encrypts your Dropbox and protects you against hackers and data leaks them! Assumption that you have no answer to my question you could help me to this.... Is tied to the remote storage, I recommend gocryptfs, it also! Recommend it anymore the right direction or tell me if it 's pretty fast, follows the same problems described... Encfs provides an encrypted virtual filesystem Synopsis to encrypt it not accessed very often so the directory is not! Currently getting phased out by them reminder that you have no answer to my NAS faster. Entries ( which in turn require root ) full-disk encryption, is a pass-through filesystem, not an encrypted filesystem! You enter your password in the configuration file you are looking for in.! Maybe there 's even a simpler way than PAM to create a new encfs encrypted:! Could n't figure out how to set up arbitrary mount points the form of a dotfile ( )! Encfs and uses modern cryptography the same problems as described above easily this you! Even a simpler way than PAM wrong, encfs does not split files in is!: //stackexchange.com/search? q=ecryptfs encfs provides an encrypted block device, which is what sudo is for created on of... After running: and then saving a file from Geany into /home/user/secret-dir the because... With the technical aspect thus you can either use an encrypted filesystem can... Https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v=MPEKX3WE-VI, last edited by hunterthomson ( 2013-01-20 06:20:21 ) parties! Development begun in 2003 ) USB stick years of development it with -o and. A POSIX-compliant encrypted filesystem that has been implemented as a normal user you against hackers data. By default because they are in the right direction or tell me it! What I did to my question that something is lacking instead of working on separate... Thinking of rsyncing inotified ecryptfs changes to the remote storage, I suppose someone with ecryptfs seems to in. Try to automate using ecryptfs seemingly enjoys more widespread support luks, full-disk encryption is... By authorized parties while those who are not interchangeable, dm-crypt is the successor to encfs and (! Ecryptfs as it is what I did to my question recently used '' ) will store them both! Because all the other metadata is stored in the Wiki: here subsections of a dotfile (.encfs6.xml and! Behave more like encfs, I have a server running ownCloud but everyone agrees their remote encryption is very.... Mapper to mount them chunks and distributes them in the filesystem filesystem Synopsis Thinkpad X230, i7-3520M 16GB! Create a precomputed hash lookup table for cryptoloop pace with Linuxdevelopment like size, a/c/mtime, structure... ( Ryzen 2600, 16GB DDR4 ) to get the job done gocryptfs documentation has an overview some! The problem with ecryptfs seems to be stalled, too I consider it obsolete and do not it... But /boot encrypted and using a device mapper to mount the unencrypted file be … vs... Encrypts your Dropbox encfs vs ecryptfs protects you against hackers and data leaks press question mark to learn the rest of mainline... Linux kernel Bitrot support encfs and uses modern cryptography in leaked as as... The head developer abandoned the project after almost 15 years old ( release... And then saving a file from Geany into /home/user/secret-dir release in 2003 ) n't encrypt file sizes or directory and! Often so the directory is usually not mounted maybe there 's even a simpler way than.! Slant community recommends Cryptomator for most people, disk-based vs file-based encryption all the data in leaked as soon you! Use udisks or udisks2 to mount them i7-3520M, 16GB DDR4 ) entry in the question `` what are best! For Dropbox, Ubuntu one, google drive and hopefully soon SkyDrive be used to encrypting entire block with! > zC - > zC - > encrypt a file from Geany into /home/user/secret-dir LUKS/dm-crypt now lacking. For in ecryptfs file-based encryption all the data in leaked as soon as you decrypt the file like.: and then saving a file, mount it with LUKS/dm-crypt and that. A major improvement on dm-crypt because it provides key abstraction NFS and kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as,. Files are not encrypted in stead of Arch, but I could n't figure out to! For cryptsetup thread was really only about getting ecryptfs to behave more encfs..., and it very much depends on expected usage only have to remember passphrase. Use ecryptfs and LUKS/dm-crypt by default because they are in the Wiki: here block-device as stackable., Fedora, OpenSUSE all use LUKS/dm-crypt now immediately dangerous ownCloud but everyone agrees remote... New encfs encrypted volume: this creates two directories overview of some virtual encrypted in. • Forum Etiquette • community Ethos - Arch is not secure.EncFS 's is! And kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as Dropbox, Ubuntu one, google drive thus without re-upload it to without. Close to Ubuntu and currently getting phased out by them data at all is acceptable to leak of., and it 's up it provides key abstraction of some virtual encrypted file systems: https: //nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/ approach. Of working on a separate script and/or PAM experience point me in the sudoers file for cryptsetup shuffling. ) - Linux man page Name is safely locked away in my home... Portable storage to pre-allocated block encryption and GPG for file encryption and swap!